

The Chief: The Life and Turbulent Times of Chief Justice John Roberts
Setup
Is the current chief justice of the United States a conservative activist, or a neutral umpire concerned first and foremost with preserving the institution of the Supreme Court? He may be a bit of both. An acclaimed recent biography, by a journalist who has known and observed Roberts for two decades, contends that Roberts is torn between two, often divergent, priorities: to carry out a conservative agenda, and to protect the court’s image and his place in history—a duality that has sowed distrust among his colleagues and anxiety about where he’s taking the court.
- 2019 Festival
- USA
Learning from failure: the SCOTUS edition
Even those who disagree with Supreme Court chief justice John Roberts on the issues usually can’t find fault with his intelligence and skill as legal mind, says Joan Biskupic, legal analyst and author of a biography about Roberts. Roberts quickly rose to prominence through Harvard Law School and the Reagan administration, cementing his reputation. But Biskupic explains how it was one of his few failures that helped him reach the Supreme Court:
Roberts the institutionalist v. Roberts the idealist
There are two competing impulses that drive John Roberts’ judicial decisions, says Joan Biskupic. One side of John Roberts is idealistically conservative — he did, after all, cut his teeth working for the Reagan administration. Another side of Roberts, though, believes vehemently in protecting the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. And in Roberts’ view, contentious decisions about polarizing issues damage the legitimacy of the Supreme Court in the public eye.
Did you know?
Biskupic says that because these impulses are often competing, Roberts has to balance his personal ideology with the realities presented to him on a literal case-by-case basis. And despite his best intentions, he often ends up confounding outside observers with decisions that sometimes fail both his ideology and his concerns for the court.
He’s smart, but is he likable?
Likeability might seem like a superficial trait for such an esteemed institution, but the quality of personal relationships between Supreme Court justices can have very real implications for how decisions are reached. Joan Biskupic says that John Roberts’ inexperience and ideological inconsistency have sown confusion and distrust amongst his fellow justices:
The “all in good time” chief justice
It’s clear that chief justice John Roberts trusts himself above all to make momentous decisions, but how does he actually reach those decisions? In response to an audience question about how to characterize John Roberts’ decision making style, Joan Biskupic breaks down how her analysis:
Learn More
Additional Information
Resources
The Chief: The Life and Turbulent Times of Chief Justice John Roberts by Joan Biskupic
Explore More
USA

In a time of heightened distrust, how can media outlets reclaim the public’s confidence? We hear from a longtime journalist.





The idea of unity is a compassionate, hopeful aspiration for a country ravaged by a global pandemic, racial injustice, economic downturn and mob violence.



Two weeks before the first woman of color became Vice President, an angry mob that included members of the white supremacist group Proud Boys, stormed the US Capitol. As Ibram...

Biden believes deeply that actions like the January 6th violence at the Capitol are not who we want to be as a country, says Evan Osnos, author of a Biden biography.





As the nation reels from the attack on the Capitol, we look for ideas that will move us forward.

Peggy Clark asks Dan Glickman to reflect on this past year and to share what he expects from our country under President-elect Joe Biden’s leadership.



“We are not in a rush to pull people back into the workplace,” says Rob Falzon







NPR's Tamara Keith and Dan Glickman discuss what a Biden agenda might look like.

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka’s family has called the city home for over 100 years.

